Geomorphology cycle of erosion notes - Davis penck and king models comparison for geography optional UPSC

cycle of erosion is fundamental in geomorphology. davis model is classic but upsc also asks about alternatives. comparative notes covering all three major models.

davis geographical cycle:

proposed by william morris davis. also called normal cycle of erosion.

stages:

youth: steep gradients active downcutting v shaped valleys waterfalls rapids. high relief.

maturity: lateral erosion begins. valleys widen. tributaries develop. maximum topographic complexity.

old age: gentle gradients meandering rivers. low relief. peneplain formation. monadnocks remain as residual hills.

assumptions:

rapid tectonic uplift followed by stability. erosion during stable period. time is crucial variable. humid climate assumed.

criticism:

requires long tectonic stability rarely found. humid climate bias. peneplain formation never actually observed completed. ignores climate variations.

penck model of landscape evolution:

walther penck proposed alternative. focused on relationship between uplift and erosion rates.

key concept:

landscape reflects balance between tectonic uplift rate and denudation rate.

waxing development: uplift faster than erosion. convex slopes develop. steepening landscape.

waning development: erosion faster than uplift. concave slopes develop. landscape lowering.

advantage over davis:

does not require tectonic stability. continuous interplay of forces. more realistic for tectonically active regions.

disadvantage:

difficult to quantify uplift and erosion rates. less practical for field application.

king pediplanation model:

lester king focused on arid and semi arid landscapes. especially africa.

key concept:

parallel retreat of slopes. escarpments retreat maintaining their angle. pediments form at base. pediments coalesce to form pediplain.

stages:

escarpment formation. parallel retreat. pediment extension. pediplain development.

application:

explains african landscape evolution better than davis model. also useful for indian peninsular region.

comparison table:

davis: slope decline sequential stages peneplain end product

penck: uplift erosion balance continuous process no specific end form

king: slope retreat parallel process pediplain end product

upsc optional relevance:

paper 1 geomorphology section. comparison question very common pattern. also asked as evaluate davis model or critically examine cycle of erosion.

diagram requirements:

slope profiles for each stage. comparative diagrams essential for full marks. practice drawing youth maturity old age cross sections.

recent research:

modern geomorphology uses quantitative approaches. landscape evolution models now computerized. davis model considered historical importance but not practically applied.

0

Discussion(2)

Guest