Civil Services Examination conducted by the Union Public Service Commission for recruitment to various Civil Services of the Government of India.

Union Public Service Commission

Uday Pratap Singh

3rd attempt. cleared mains twice before but never interview. optional score was always issue. psir kept fluctuating between 230-265. this year targeting 290 plus. sharing hard won lessons.

why psir scores fluctuate:

paper 1 political theory is predictable. paper 2 ir and indian politics varies wildly depending on evaluator. same answer can get 8 or 14 out of 20.

what i was doing wrong:

over theorizing:

i quoted every thinker for every question. rawls rousseau marx all in one answer. examiner wants application not bibliography.

ignoring indian politics:

paper 2 section b is indian politics and foreign policy. i focused more on ir theory. but this section has highest scoring potential with right preparation.

generic ir answers:

for china us relations i wrote generic realism liberalism debate. everyone writes that. no differentiation.

what i changed:

paper 1 approach:

political theory:

focused answers. one question one or two thinkers maximum. depth over breadth. for social contract compare hobbes locke properly. dont add rousseau rawls kant in same answer.

indian political thought:

often ignored by aspirants but easy scoring. gandhi ambedkar roy tilak. understand their contemporary relevance. link to current debates.

paper 2 approach:

ir theory:

reduced theory percentage in answers. increased empirical examples. for any theory show how it explains current events. ukraine conflict is realism example. climate cooperation is liberal institutionalism.

indian foreign policy:

this became my scoring area. india specific foreign policy questions are predictable. act east quad indo pacific neighbourhood policy.

read mea website. know about recent visits agreements. current affairs of last 2 years integrated.

comparative politics:

section often done poorly. but if prepared well can differentiate. uk us comparative. federal systems. party systems.

study material changes:

dropped shubhra ranjan coaching notes. made own notes from academic sources. nd arora for indian politics. andrew heywood for political theory. joshua goldstein for ir.

answer structure:

intro: 2 lines setting context
body: 3-4 points with examples
contemporary relevance: 2-3 lines
conclusion: 1-2 lines

no diagrams in psir but structured writing with clear paragraphs helps.

test series evaluation:

joined test series with detailed feedback. analyzed why marks vary. understood what evaluator looks for.

psir optional after 3 attempts - what i finally understood about scoring in political science international relations 3rd attempt. cleared mains twice before but never interview. optional score was always issue. psir kept fluctuating between 230-265. this year targeting 290 plus. sharing hard won lessons.

why psir scores fluctuate:

paper 1 political theory is predictable. paper 2 ir and indian politics varies wildly depending on evaluator. same answer can get 8 or 14 out of 20.

what i was doing wrong:

over theorizing:

i quoted every thinker for every question. rawls rousseau marx all in one answer. examiner wants application not bibliography.

ignoring indian politics:

paper 2 section b is indian politics and foreign policy. i focused more on ir theory. but this section has highest scoring potential with right preparation.

generic ir answers:

for china us relations i wrote generic realism liberalism debate. everyone writes that. no differentiation.

what i changed:

paper 1 approach:

political theory:

focused answers. one question one or two thinkers maximum. depth over breadth. for social contract compare hobbes locke properly. dont add rousseau rawls kant in same answer.

indian political thought:

often ignored by aspirants but easy scoring. gandhi ambedkar roy tilak. understand their contemporary relevance. link to current debates.

paper 2 approach:

ir theory:

reduced theory percentage in answers. increased empirical examples. for any theory show how it explains current events. ukraine conflict is realism example. climate cooperation is liberal institutionalism.

indian foreign policy:

this became my scoring area. india specific foreign policy questions are predictable. act east quad indo pacific neighbourhood policy.

read mea website. know about recent visits agreements. current affairs of last 2 years integrated.

comparative politics:

section often done poorly. but if prepared well can differentiate. uk us comparative. federal systems. party systems.

study material changes:

dropped shubhra ranjan coaching notes. made own notes from academic sources. nd arora for indian politics. andrew heywood for political theory. joshua goldstein for ir.

answer structure:

intro: 2 lines setting context
body: 3-4 points with examples
contemporary relevance: 2-3 lines
conclusion: 1-2 lines

no diagrams in psir but structured writing with clear paragraphs helps.

test series evaluation:

joined test series with detailed feedback. analyzed why marks vary. understood what evaluator looks for.  uday pratap singh strategy upsc

PSIR optional after 3 attempts - what I finally understood about scoring in political science international relations

third attempt. psir optional. varanasi boy in delhi. this is it. sharing what changes mentally and strategically when you know time is running out.

PREVIOUS ATTEMPTS SUMMARY:

attempt 1: prelims cleared, mains bombed
- reason: no answer writing practice
- optional marks: 180 (disaster)
- gs marks: average
- lesson: writing > reading

attempt 2: mains reached, interview missed by 11 marks
- reason: gs2 and gs4 underperformed
- optional marks: 260 (improved significantly)
- total: 740ish
- lesson: so close yet so far

MENTAL STATE NOW:

honest feelings:
- pressure is real but different from first two times
- less anxiety about "what if i fail" more focus on "how to succeed"
- family expectations are heavy but motivating
- financial pressure (cant keep preparing forever)

what helped mentally:
- accepting that this might be last attempt removed some paradoxical pressure
- focusing on controllables, not outcome
- therapy (yes, its okay to get help)
- physical exercise daily

STRATEGY CHANGES:

1. time allocation shift

previous: equal time to all papers
now: strategic weighting based on scoring potential

my scoring analysis:
- optional: can score 270+ (strength)
- essay: can score 130+ (improved)
- gs1: consistent 100-110
- gs2: weakness (fixing this)
- gs3: decent 100-105
- gs4: weakness (fixing this)

time going to gs2 and gs4 now. not starting from scratch on strengths.

2. answer writing intensity

previous: 2-3 answers daily
now: 5-6 answers daily with evaluation

invested in mentor program. expensive but worth it. cant afford to practice wrong patterns.

3. current affairs approach

previous: comprehensive compilation
now: selective depth

focusing on:
- issues with analytical angles (not just facts)
- gs2 governance linkage specifically
- ethics case study material

4. revision frequency

previous: monthly revision
now: weekly micro-revision, monthly macro-revision

micro = quick recall of weeks topics
macro = full subject revision

5. optional refinement

psir at 260 is good. targeting 280+.

changes:
- paper 2 focus (international relations scoring better than paper 1)
- contemporary examples updated
- answer presentation improved

DAILY ROUTINE:

5:00 - wake, light exercise
5:30-8:30 - optional or gs depth (alternating)
8:30-9:30 - newspaper analysis
9:30-1:00 - gs static revision
1:00-2:00 - lunch, rest
2:00-4:00 - answer writing (evaluated)
4:00-5:00 - answer review and correction
5:00-6:30 - current affairs consolidation
6:30-7:30 - evening walk, calls
7:30-9:00 - light revision, next day prep
9:00-10:00 - reading (non-upsc sometimes)
10:00 - sleep

total: 10-11 hours focused

WHAT I TELL MYSELF:

"you've proven you can clear prelims and mains. interview is learnable. just need to put it together."

"11 marks is nothing. consistent small improvements will cover it."

"age is still on your side. but preparation time isn't unlimited."

"one more year of focused effort vs lifetime of what-ifs."

FOR FELLOW FINAL ATTEMPT ASPIRANTS:

youre not alone. the pressure is real but so is your preparation.

analysis your gaps honestly. dont repeat same strategy expecting different results.

invest in evaluation. at this stage, self-review isnt enough.

take care of mental health. burnt out aspirant cant perform optimally.

this attempt will be different because YOU are different. two attempts worth of learning is with you.

lets do this.

third and hopefully final attempt preparations - what changes when you know this might be your last shot third attempt. psir optional. varanasi boy in delhi. this is it. sharing what changes mentally and strategically when you know time is running out.

previous attempts summary:

attempt 1: prelims cleared, mains bombed
- reason: no answer writing practice
- optional marks: 180 (disaster)
- gs marks: average
- lesson: writing > reading

attempt 2: mains reached, interview missed by 11 marks
- reason: gs2 and gs4 underperformed
- optional marks: 260 (improved significantly)
- total: 740ish
- lesson: so close yet so far

mental state now:

honest feelings:
- pressure is real but different from first two times
- less anxiety about "what if i fail" more focus on "how to succeed"
- family expectations are heavy but motivating
- financial pressure (cant keep preparing forever)

what helped mentally:
- accepting that this might be last attempt removed some paradoxical pressure
- focusing on controllables, not outcome
- therapy (yes, its okay to get help)
- physical exercise daily

strategy changes:

1. time allocation shift

previous: equal time to all papers
now: strategic weighting based on scoring potential

my scoring analysis:
- optional: can score 270+ (strength)
- essay: can score 130+ (improved)
- gs1: consistent 100-110
- gs2: weakness (fixing this)
- gs3: decent 100-105
- gs4: weakness (fixing this)

time going to gs2 and gs4 now. not starting from scratch on strengths.

2. answer writing intensity

previous: 2-3 answers daily
now: 5-6 answers daily with evaluation

invested in mentor program. expensive but worth it. cant afford to practice wrong patterns.

3. current affairs approach

previous: comprehensive compilation
now: selective depth

focusing on:
- issues with analytical angles (not just facts)
- gs2 governance linkage specifically
- ethics case study material

4. revision frequency

previous: monthly revision
now: weekly micro-revision, monthly macro-revision

micro = quick recall of weeks topics
macro = full subject revision

5. optional refinement

psir at 260 is good. targeting 280+.

changes:
- paper 2 focus (international relations scoring better than paper 1)
- contemporary examples updated
- answer presentation improved

daily routine:

5:00 - wake, light exercise
5:30-8:30 - optional or gs depth (alternating)
8:30-9:30 - newspaper analysis
9:30-1:00 - gs static revision
1:00-2:00 - lunch, rest
2:00-4:00 - answer writing (evaluated)
4:00-5:00 - answer review and correction
5:00-6:30 - current affairs consolidation
6:30-7:30 - evening walk, calls
7:30-9:00 - light revision, next day prep
9:00-10:00 - reading (non-upsc sometimes)
10:00 - sleep

total: 10-11 hours focused

what i tell myself:

"you've proven you can clear prelims and mains. interview is learnable. just need to put it together."

"11 marks is nothing. consistent small improvements will cover it."

"age is still on your side. but preparation time isn't unlimited."

"one more year of focused effort vs lifetime of what-ifs."

for fellow final attempt aspirants:

youre not alone. the pressure is real but so is your preparation.

analysis your gaps honestly. dont repeat same strategy expecting different results.

invest in evaluation. at this stage, self-review isnt enough.

take care of mental health. burnt out aspirant cant perform optimally.

this attempt will be different because you are different. two attempts worth of learning is with you.

lets do this.  uday pratap singh topic-discussion upsc

Third and hopefully final attempt preparations - what changes when you know this might be your last shot

psir paper 2 is comparative politics and international relations. thinkers are essential here. systematic approach to cover them.

PAPER 2 STRUCTURE:

PART A: COMPARATIVE POLITICS
- political development and underdevelopment
- politics of representation
- globalization
- approaches: dependency, world systems

PART B: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
- theoretical approaches
- cold war and post-cold war
- india foreign policy
- contemporary global issues

KEY THINKERS BY SECTION:

DEVELOPMENT POLITICS:

1. ROSTOW (modernization theory)
- stages of growth: traditional → take-off → maturity
- linear development path
- western model as universal
criticism: ignores structural factors, eurocentric

2. A.G. FRANK (dependency theory)
- metropolis-satellite relationship
- underdevelopment is created
- core exploits periphery
criticism: oversimplified, ignores internal factors

3. WALLERSTEIN (world systems theory)
- core, semi-periphery, periphery
- global capitalist system analysis
- historical structural approach
criticism: economic determinism, agency ignored

4. AMARTYA SEN (capability approach)
- development as freedom
- capabilities vs achievements
- human development focus
application: hdi development

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY:

1. REALISM (morgenthau, waltz)
- state centric
- power politics
- anarchy in international system
- national interest paramount
application: cold war analysis, indo-pak relations

2. LIBERALISM (keohane, nye)
- international institutions matter
- interdependence reduces conflict
- cooperation possible
- multiple actors, not just states
application: un role, wto analysis, eu integration

3. CONSTRUCTIVISM (wendt)
- ideas and identity matter
- anarchy is what states make of it
- social construction of interests
application: identity politics, norm diffusion

4. MARXIST IR (lenin, gramsci)
- class analysis of international
- imperialism as highest stage of capitalism
- hegemony concept (gramsci)
application: north-south relations, tnc role

5. FEMINIST IR (enloe, tickner)
- gender analysis of ir
- security redefined
- invisible actors made visible
application: women in conflict, human security

HOW TO USE THINKERS:

in every answer, relevant thinker adds depth:

question: critically analyze india-china relations

approach with thinkers:
- realist lens: power competition, border as security issue
- liberal lens: economic interdependence, institutional engagement (brics, sco)
- constructivist lens: identity formation, historical memory

showing multiple perspectives = analytical depth = higher marks

COMPARATIVE POLITICS APPROACH:

for comparison questions (uk vs france, india vs china):

framework:
1. select comparison criteria
2. apply theoretical lens
3. explain similarities and differences
4. offer analytical assessment

example: compare party systems of uk and india

criteria: number of parties, ideological spectrum, coalition patterns
theory: almond coleman structural functionalism, sartori classification
analysis: two party vs multiparty, regional parties role, coalition compulsion

MEMORIZATION TECHNIQUE:

for each thinker, remember:
- ONE core concept (in one sentence)
- ONE example/application
- ONE criticism

rostow: stages of growth, western development model, criticized for linear thinking
frank: dependency, latin america, criticized for ignoring agency

ANSWER STRUCTURE:

for theory-based questions:
para 1: introduce the theoretical debate
para 2: explain dominant theory
para 3: explain alternative theory
para 4: apply to concrete case
para 5: evaluate strengths and weaknesses
para 6: your position with justification

for thinker-based questions:
para 1: context and background of thinker
para 2: main contributions
para 3: methodology and approach
para 4: criticism from other schools
para 5: contemporary relevance
para 6: assessment

RESOURCES:

- op gauba (indian author, comprehensive)
- baylis smith (ir theory)
- heywood (political theory)
- ignou ma polsci material (free, detailed)
- foreign affairs journal (current ir debates)

psir paper 2 is about frameworks. learn frameworks, apply to any question.

psir paper 2 thinkers approach - comparative politics and international relations framework psir paper 2 is comparative politics and international relations. thinkers are essential here. systematic approach to cover them.

paper 2 structure:

part a: comparative politics
- political development and underdevelopment
- politics of representation
- globalization
- approaches: dependency, world systems

part b: international relations
- theoretical approaches
- cold war and post-cold war
- india foreign policy
- contemporary global issues

key thinkers by section:

development politics:

1. rostow (modernization theory)
- stages of growth: traditional → take-off → maturity
- linear development path
- western model as universal
criticism: ignores structural factors, eurocentric

2. a.g. frank (dependency theory)
- metropolis-satellite relationship
- underdevelopment is created
- core exploits periphery
criticism: oversimplified, ignores internal factors

3. wallerstein (world systems theory)
- core, semi-periphery, periphery
- global capitalist system analysis
- historical structural approach
criticism: economic determinism, agency ignored

4. amartya sen (capability approach)
- development as freedom
- capabilities vs achievements
- human development focus
application: hdi development

international relations theory:

1. realism (morgenthau, waltz)
- state centric
- power politics
- anarchy in international system
- national interest paramount
application: cold war analysis, indo-pak relations

2. liberalism (keohane, nye)
- international institutions matter
- interdependence reduces conflict
- cooperation possible
- multiple actors, not just states
application: un role, wto analysis, eu integration

3. constructivism (wendt)
- ideas and identity matter
- anarchy is what states make of it
- social construction of interests
application: identity politics, norm diffusion

4. marxist ir (lenin, gramsci)
- class analysis of international
- imperialism as highest stage of capitalism
- hegemony concept (gramsci)
application: north-south relations, tnc role

5. feminist ir (enloe, tickner)
- gender analysis of ir
- security redefined
- invisible actors made visible
application: women in conflict, human security

how to use thinkers:

in every answer, relevant thinker adds depth:

question: critically analyze india-china relations

approach with thinkers:
- realist lens: power competition, border as security issue
- liberal lens: economic interdependence, institutional engagement (brics, sco)
- constructivist lens: identity formation, historical memory

showing multiple perspectives = analytical depth = higher marks

comparative politics approach:

for comparison questions (uk vs france, india vs china):

framework:
1. select comparison criteria
2. apply theoretical lens
3. explain similarities and differences
4. offer analytical assessment

example: compare party systems of uk and india

criteria: number of parties, ideological spectrum, coalition patterns
theory: almond coleman structural functionalism, sartori classification
analysis: two party vs multiparty, regional parties role, coalition compulsion

memorization technique:

for each thinker, remember:
- one core concept (in one sentence)
- one example/application
- one criticism

rostow: stages of growth, western development model, criticized for linear thinking
frank: dependency, latin america, criticized for ignoring agency

answer structure:

for theory-based questions:
para 1: introduce the theoretical debate
para 2: explain dominant theory
para 3: explain alternative theory
para 4: apply to concrete case
para 5: evaluate strengths and weaknesses
para 6: your position with justification

for thinker-based questions:
para 1: context and background of thinker
para 2: main contributions
para 3: methodology and approach
para 4: criticism from other schools
para 5: contemporary relevance
para 6: assessment

resources:

- op gauba (indian author, comprehensive)
- baylis smith (ir theory)
- heywood (political theory)
- ignou ma polsci material (free, detailed)
- foreign affairs journal (current ir debates)

psir paper 2 is about frameworks. learn frameworks, apply to any question.  uday pratap singh notes upsc

PSIR Paper 2 thinkers approach - comparative politics and international relations framework

this is it. third and final attempt. 2026 mains is my last shot at upsc. sharing how my approach has changed after two failures.

MY JOURNEY:

attempt 1 (2024):
- prelims cleared
- mains failed
- reason: poor answer writing, time management disaster

attempt 2 (2025):
- prelims cleared again
- mains: wrote better but not good enough
- missed cutoff by 15 marks
- interview not reached

attempt 3 (2026):
- this is the one. inshallah.

WHAT WENT WRONG PREVIOUSLY:

ATTEMPT 1 MISTAKES:

1. started answer writing too late
started only 2 months before mains. way too late.

2. ignored essay paper
thought it was easy. scored 95. disaster.

3. optional overconfidence
psir is my strong area. didnt practice enough. scored 230.

4. time management in exam hall
left 2 questions unattempted in gs2 and gs3 each.

ATTEMPT 2 IMPROVEMENTS:

1. started answer writing 6 months before
better but still not enough.

2. essay practice weekly
improved to 115. still not great.

3. optional test series
improved to 265. decent.

4. time management better
completed all questions but quality suffered.

STILL FAILED BECAUSE:
- answer quality plateaued
- didnt analyze weak areas deeply enough
- mental fatigue affected performance
- made silly mistakes in exam

WHAT IM CHANGING FOR ATTEMPT 3:

1. COMPLETE SYLLABUS OVERHAUL

going back to basics. re-reading everything:
- not skimming through
- making fresh concise notes
- understanding not memorizing

sound elementary but foundation was shaky.

2. DAILY ANSWER WRITING FROM DAY 1

yes from day 1. even basic topics.
- 2 answers daily minimum
- weekly evaluation
- immediate correction cycle

3. ESSAY IS PRIORITY

dedicated 4 hours weekly for essay:
- diverse topics
- brainstorming practice
- structure improvement
- example bank building

targeting 135+ this time.

4. OPTIONAL DEPTH INCREASE

psir paper 2 needs more current linkages:
- daily ir news tracking
- foreign policy updates
- international organization current events

targeting 280+ this time.

5. PHYSICAL FITNESS

previously ignored health. this time:
- morning walk daily
- yoga for concentration
- proper sleep schedule
- no junk food binge eating

fitness affects mental clarity. learned this hard way.

6. MENTAL PREPARATION

this is final attempt pressure. handling it by:
- daily meditation
- talking to counselor monthly
- not isolating from family friends
- accepting outcome whatever it is

7. SMART PREPARATION

- focus on high weightage areas
- pyq pattern based preparation
- no new topics in last 3 months
- revision cycles planned

TIMELINE:

jan-march 2026: foundation revision
april-june: mains intensive preparation
july: prelims final prep
august-sept: post prelims mains intensive
sept 15: mains exam (expected)

MINDSET SHIFT:

previously: "i have more attempts left"
now: "this is the only attempt"

urgency is different. motivation is different. fear of failure is real but channeling it productively.

FOR FELLOW FINAL ATTEMPT ASPIRANTS:

1. we are not alone
2. failure doesnt define us
3. one more attempt is still possible
4. but treat it as final even if not
5. backup is not betrayal

my backup: state psc, teaching, further studies. having backup keeps me sane.

MESSAGE TO 2026 MAINS ASPIRANTS:

whether its your first or third attempt, give your absolute best. jo hoga dekha jayega, but regret nahi hona chahiye.

will share monthly progress. lets do this together.

varanasi se ek aur attempt. is baar pakka. 🙏

third and final attempt mindset - how i am approaching upsc 2026 differently after two failures this is it. third and final attempt. 2026 mains is my last shot at upsc. sharing how my approach has changed after two failures.

my journey:

attempt 1 (2024):
- prelims cleared
- mains failed
- reason: poor answer writing, time management disaster

attempt 2 (2025):
- prelims cleared again
- mains: wrote better but not good enough
- missed cutoff by 15 marks
- interview not reached

attempt 3 (2026):
- this is the one. inshallah.

what went wrong previously:

attempt 1 mistakes:

1. started answer writing too late
started only 2 months before mains. way too late.

2. ignored essay paper
thought it was easy. scored 95. disaster.

3. optional overconfidence
psir is my strong area. didnt practice enough. scored 230.

4. time management in exam hall
left 2 questions unattempted in gs2 and gs3 each.

attempt 2 improvements:

1. started answer writing 6 months before
better but still not enough.

2. essay practice weekly
improved to 115. still not great.

3. optional test series
improved to 265. decent.

4. time management better
completed all questions but quality suffered.

still failed because:
- answer quality plateaued
- didnt analyze weak areas deeply enough
- mental fatigue affected performance
- made silly mistakes in exam

what im changing for attempt 3:

1. complete syllabus overhaul

going back to basics. re-reading everything:
- not skimming through
- making fresh concise notes
- understanding not memorizing

sound elementary but foundation was shaky.

2. daily answer writing from day 1

yes from day 1. even basic topics.
- 2 answers daily minimum
- weekly evaluation
- immediate correction cycle

3. essay is priority

dedicated 4 hours weekly for essay:
- diverse topics
- brainstorming practice
- structure improvement
- example bank building

targeting 135+ this time.

4. optional depth increase

psir paper 2 needs more current linkages:
- daily ir news tracking
- foreign policy updates
- international organization current events

targeting 280+ this time.

5. physical fitness

previously ignored health. this time:
- morning walk daily
- yoga for concentration
- proper sleep schedule
- no junk food binge eating

fitness affects mental clarity. learned this hard way.

6. mental preparation

this is final attempt pressure. handling it by:
- daily meditation
- talking to counselor monthly
- not isolating from family friends
- accepting outcome whatever it is

7. smart preparation

- focus on high weightage areas
- pyq pattern based preparation
- no new topics in last 3 months
- revision cycles planned

timeline:

jan-march 2026: foundation revision
april-june: mains intensive preparation
july: prelims final prep
august-sept: post prelims mains intensive
sept 15: mains exam (expected)

mindset shift:

previously: "i have more attempts left"
now: "this is the only attempt"

urgency is different. motivation is different. fear of failure is real but channeling it productively.

for fellow final attempt aspirants:

1. we are not alone
2. failure doesnt define us
3. one more attempt is still possible
4. but treat it as final even if not
5. backup is not betrayal

my backup: state psc, teaching, further studies. having backup keeps me sane.

message to 2026 mains aspirants:

whether its your first or third attempt, give your absolute best. jo hoga dekha jayega, but regret nahi hona chahiye.

will share monthly progress. lets do this together.

varanasi se ek aur attempt. is baar pakka. 🙏  uday pratap singh topic-discussion upsc

Uday Pratap Singh

Posts