Civil Services Examination conducted by the Union Public Service Commission for recruitment to various Civil Services of the Government of India.

Union Public Service Commission

Nikhil Mathur

okay real talk from an IIT kanpur grad who took maths optional thinking itd be a cakewalk. spoiler alert: it wasnt. i scored 195 in my first attempt which for a math optional with engineering background is embarrassingly low. heres my honest assessment of what went wrong and what ive changed.

first lets address the myth. yes engineering maths gives you a head start in linear algebra, calculus, and ODE/PDE. BUT upsc maths optional syllabus goes significantly beyond engineering curriculum in most areas. real analysis, abstract algebra (group theory, ring theory), complex analysis, and mechanics (statics and dynamics) are either not covered or barely covered in standard engineering programs.

the biggest shock: real analysis. engineering teaches you how to use calculus. real analysis teaches you why calculus works. proving that a sequence converges, showing a function is uniformly continuous, working with epsilon-delta definitions rigorously - this is pure mathematics that engineers simply dont do. i spent 3 months just on real analysis and it still remains my weakest area.

abstract algebra was another revelation. yes i knew matrices from engineering. but group theory - permutation groups, cyclic groups, coset decomposition, sylow theorems - this is a completely different mathematical universe. you need to be comfortable with abstract proof-based mathematics, not computational mathematics.

what actually helped from engineering: linear algebra (eigenvalues, diagonalization, cayley-hamilton theorem), numerical analysis (newton-raphson, interpolation, numerical integration), ODE solving techniques, and vector calculus (stokes, gauss, green theorems). these topics were relatively easy to prepare because i already had the computational skills.

my study approach for attempt two: i divided the syllabus into three categories. comfort zone (linear algebra, ODE, calculus) - 2 months. learning zone (complex analysis, statics, dynamics) - 3 months. danger zone (real analysis, abstract algebra) - 4 months. more time allocated to weaker areas obviously.

resources that work: for real analysis - bartle and sherbert elements of real analysis plus S.C. malik and savita arora. for abstract algebra - herstein topics in algebra plus joseph gallian contemporary abstract algebra. for mechanics - S.L. loney statics and dynamics. for linear algebra - hoffman and kunze.

practice is everything in maths optional. theory understanding is maybe 30 percent of the battle. the remaining 70 percent is solving problems under time pressure. i solve 5-6 problems daily and do one full paper mock weekly. the time management aspect is crucial because maths optional papers are long and if you get stuck on one problem, you lose time for easier problems later.

graphical interpretation: upsc loves asking questions where you need to visualize the mathematical concept. curve sketching, plotting regions for double integrals, phase portraits for differential equations - these visual skills separate average scores from good scores.

the scoring reality: maths optional average scores have been declining over the last 5 years. the era of 300+ scores is rare now. a realistic target is 240-270 for someone with engineering background and good preparation. this is still competitive with other optionals so dont be discouraged by the absolute numbers.

my advice to engineers considering maths optional: do a 2-month trial. study real analysis and abstract algebra basics. if you enjoy proof-based mathematics, take maths optional. if you find proofs frustrating and prefer computational work, consider statistics optional or another subject altogether.

maths optional reality check - engineering background helps but its not enough okay real talk from an iit kanpur grad who took maths optional thinking itd be a cakewalk. spoiler alert: it wasnt. i scored 195 in my first attempt which for a math optional with engineering background is embarrassingly low. heres my honest assessment of what went wrong and what ive changed.

first lets address the myth. yes engineering maths gives you a head start in linear algebra, calculus, and ode/pde. but upsc maths optional syllabus goes significantly beyond engineering curriculum in most areas. real analysis, abstract algebra (group theory, ring theory), complex analysis, and mechanics (statics and dynamics) are either not covered or barely covered in standard engineering programs.

the biggest shock: real analysis. engineering teaches you how to use calculus. real analysis teaches you why calculus works. proving that a sequence converges, showing a function is uniformly continuous, working with epsilon-delta definitions rigorously - this is pure mathematics that engineers simply dont do. i spent 3 months just on real analysis and it still remains my weakest area.

abstract algebra was another revelation. yes i knew matrices from engineering. but group theory - permutation groups, cyclic groups, coset decomposition, sylow theorems - this is a completely different mathematical universe. you need to be comfortable with abstract proof-based mathematics, not computational mathematics.

what actually helped from engineering: linear algebra (eigenvalues, diagonalization, cayley-hamilton theorem), numerical analysis (newton-raphson, interpolation, numerical integration), ode solving techniques, and vector calculus (stokes, gauss, green theorems). these topics were relatively easy to prepare because i already had the computational skills.

my study approach for attempt two: i divided the syllabus into three categories. comfort zone (linear algebra, ode, calculus) - 2 months. learning zone (complex analysis, statics, dynamics) - 3 months. danger zone (real analysis, abstract algebra) - 4 months. more time allocated to weaker areas obviously.

resources that work: for real analysis - bartle and sherbert elements of real analysis plus s.c. malik and savita arora. for abstract algebra - herstein topics in algebra plus joseph gallian contemporary abstract algebra. for mechanics - s.l. loney statics and dynamics. for linear algebra - hoffman and kunze.

practice is everything in maths optional. theory understanding is maybe 30 percent of the battle. the remaining 70 percent is solving problems under time pressure. i solve 5-6 problems daily and do one full paper mock weekly. the time management aspect is crucial because maths optional papers are long and if you get stuck on one problem, you lose time for easier problems later.

graphical interpretation: upsc loves asking questions where you need to visualize the mathematical concept. curve sketching, plotting regions for double integrals, phase portraits for differential equations - these visual skills separate average scores from good scores.

the scoring reality: maths optional average scores have been declining over the last 5 years. the era of 300+ scores is rare now. a realistic target is 240-270 for someone with engineering background and good preparation. this is still competitive with other optionals so dont be discouraged by the absolute numbers.

my advice to engineers considering maths optional: do a 2-month trial. study real analysis and abstract algebra basics. if you enjoy proof-based mathematics, take maths optional. if you find proofs frustrating and prefer computational work, consider statistics optional or another subject altogether.  nikhil mathur topic-discussion upsc

Maths Optional Reality Check - Engineering Background Helps But Its Not Enough

engineering background doesnt automatically mean maths optional is easy. upsc maths is pure mathematics, different from applied engineering maths. sharing reality check and approach.

THE MISCONCEPTION:

engineers think: i did engineering maths 4 years, maths optional will be cakewalk
reality: upsc maths is bsc/msc level pure mathematics with proof-based questions

engineering maths = application focused, formula based
upsc maths = theorem proving, conceptual depth, rigorous proofs

PAPER 1 SYLLABUS BREAKDOWN:

section a:
1. linear algebra
2. calculus
3. analytic geometry

section b:
1. ordinary differential equations
2. dynamics and statics
3. vector analysis

focus today on linear algebra and calculus - the foundation.

LINEAR ALGEBRA APPROACH:

topics in order of importance:

1. vector spaces and subspaces
- definition and examples
- linear dependence/independence
- basis and dimension
- this is conceptual, not computational

2. linear transformations
- matrix representation
- kernel and image
- rank nullity theorem
- understand proofs, not just applications

3. eigenvalues and eigenvectors
- characteristic equation
- cayley hamilton theorem
- diagonalization
- engineers know computation, learn theory

4. inner product spaces
- gram schmidt process
- orthogonal projections
- least squares approximation

common mistake: jumping to problem solving without understanding definitions. in pure maths, definitions ARE the problems.

CALCULUS APPROACH:

upsc calculus is rigorous. epsilon-delta proofs matter.

1. limits and continuity
- epsilon delta definition
- uniform continuity
- different from engineering intuitive understanding

2. differentiability
- mean value theorems (rolles, lagrange, cauchy)
- taylors theorem with remainder
- proofs required, not just application

3. riemann integration
- definition through partitions
- integrability criteria
- improper integrals

4. multivariable calculus
- partial derivatives
- jacobians
- multiple integrals
- change of variables

5. sequences and series
- convergence tests
- uniform convergence
- power series

BOOK RECOMMENDATIONS:

linear algebra:
primary: hoffman and kunze (standard for pure linear algebra)
alternative: krishnamurthy
for intuition: gilbert strang lectures (youtube)

calculus:
primary: apostol mathematical analysis
alternative: shanti narayan
for rigor: rudin principles (challenging but excellent)

PROBLEM SOLVING STRATEGY:

step 1: master definitions (2 weeks per topic)
step 2: prove theorems yourself (dont just read proofs)
step 3: solve previous year questions (20 years minimum)
step 4: attempt coaching test series

time allocation:
linear algebra: 6-8 weeks
calculus: 8-10 weeks
remaining paper 1 topics: 8-10 weeks

REALITY CHECK:

maths optional needs 8-10 hours daily for 8-10 months if starting from engineering level. its not part-time optional.

scoring potential: very high (300+ possible)
risk: very high if preparation incomplete

only choose if:
1. genuine interest in pure mathematics
2. can dedicate 8+ months exclusive preparation
3. have access to good guidance (self study is hard)

if youre choosing maths optional because of engineering background, reconsider. choose because you love mathematical rigor and proof-based thinking.

maths optional rewards depth over breadth. go deep or go home.

mathematics optional paper 1 linear algebra and calculus - foundation building approach for engineering graduates engineering background doesnt automatically mean maths optional is easy. upsc maths is pure mathematics, different from applied engineering maths. sharing reality check and approach.

the misconception:

engineers think: i did engineering maths 4 years, maths optional will be cakewalk
reality: upsc maths is bsc/msc level pure mathematics with proof-based questions

engineering maths = application focused, formula based
upsc maths = theorem proving, conceptual depth, rigorous proofs

paper 1 syllabus breakdown:

section a:
1. linear algebra
2. calculus
3. analytic geometry

section b:
1. ordinary differential equations
2. dynamics and statics
3. vector analysis

focus today on linear algebra and calculus - the foundation.

linear algebra approach:

topics in order of importance:

1. vector spaces and subspaces
- definition and examples
- linear dependence/independence
- basis and dimension
- this is conceptual, not computational

2. linear transformations
- matrix representation
- kernel and image
- rank nullity theorem
- understand proofs, not just applications

3. eigenvalues and eigenvectors
- characteristic equation
- cayley hamilton theorem
- diagonalization
- engineers know computation, learn theory

4. inner product spaces
- gram schmidt process
- orthogonal projections
- least squares approximation

common mistake: jumping to problem solving without understanding definitions. in pure maths, definitions are the problems.

calculus approach:

upsc calculus is rigorous. epsilon-delta proofs matter.

1. limits and continuity
- epsilon delta definition
- uniform continuity
- different from engineering intuitive understanding

2. differentiability
- mean value theorems (rolles, lagrange, cauchy)
- taylors theorem with remainder
- proofs required, not just application

3. riemann integration
- definition through partitions
- integrability criteria
- improper integrals

4. multivariable calculus
- partial derivatives
- jacobians
- multiple integrals
- change of variables

5. sequences and series
- convergence tests
- uniform convergence
- power series

book recommendations:

linear algebra:
primary: hoffman and kunze (standard for pure linear algebra)
alternative: krishnamurthy
for intuition: gilbert strang lectures (youtube)

calculus:
primary: apostol mathematical analysis
alternative: shanti narayan
for rigor: rudin principles (challenging but excellent)

problem solving strategy:

step 1: master definitions (2 weeks per topic)
step 2: prove theorems yourself (dont just read proofs)
step 3: solve previous year questions (20 years minimum)
step 4: attempt coaching test series

time allocation:
linear algebra: 6-8 weeks
calculus: 8-10 weeks
remaining paper 1 topics: 8-10 weeks

reality check:

maths optional needs 8-10 hours daily for 8-10 months if starting from engineering level. its not part-time optional.

scoring potential: very high (300+ possible)
risk: very high if preparation incomplete

only choose if:
1. genuine interest in pure mathematics
2. can dedicate 8+ months exclusive preparation
3. have access to good guidance (self study is hard)

if youre choosing maths optional because of engineering background, reconsider. choose because you love mathematical rigor and proof-based thinking.

maths optional rewards depth over breadth. go deep or go home.  nikhil mathur strategy upsc

Mathematics optional paper 1 linear algebra and calculus - foundation building approach for engineering graduates

engineer here. thought maths optional would be cakewalk. was humbled badly. sharing reality for fellow engineers considering maths.

THE INITIAL ASSUMPTION:

- did engineering maths for 4 years
- jee advanced maths was tough, upsc cant be harder
- numerical ability is strength
- less theory, more problems = comfort zone

all these assumptions were wrong.

REALITY CHECK:

upsc maths syllabus overlap with engineering: maybe 30%

what engineering covers:
- calculus (differential, integral)
- linear algebra basics
- differential equations
- numerical methods
- probability and statistics

what upsc adds:
- real analysis (rigorous proofs)
- complex analysis depth
- abstract algebra (groups, rings, fields)
- linear programming (optimization)
- mechanics (statics and dynamics)
- partial differential equations depth

the abstract algebra and real analysis portions have ZERO overlap with engineering curriculum. starting from scratch.

THE DIFFICULTY DIFFERENCE:

jee maths: problem solving speed and accuracy
engineering maths: application-oriented, formula-based
upsc maths: proof-based, conceptual depth, answer writing

the biggest shock: upsc maths requires writing proofs. engineers rarely write proofs after 12th. we use formulas, get numerical answers. upsc wants mathematical reasoning written out.

SYLLABUS ANALYSIS:

paper 1:
- linear algebra (doable for engineers)
- calculus (mostly familiar)
- analytic geometry (needs practice)
- ordinary differential equations (familiar)
- dynamics and statics (needs fresh learning)
- vector analysis (familiar)

paper 2:
- algebra (abstract - completely new)
- real analysis (new and challenging)
- complex analysis (partially familiar)
- linear programming (new but logical)
- partial differential equations (needs depth)
- numerical analysis (familiar)
- mechanics (new for most engineers)

ENGINEERS WHO SUCCEED:

pattern observed from successful engineer-maths-optional combinations:

1. they started fresh. didnt assume engineering knowledge transfers.

2. they invested heavily in abstract algebra and real analysis. spent 3-4 months just on these.

3. they practiced proof writing daily. treated it as new skill acquisition.

4. they found specialized guidance. maths optional coaching or mentor who understood their gaps.

5. they gave 2 attempts minimum. first attempt was learning curve, second was scoring.

MY STRATEGY NOW:

month 1-2: abstract algebra from zero
- gallian book cover to cover
- prove every theorem, dont just read

month 3-4: real analysis foundation
- bartle and sherbert
- epsilon-delta proofs practice

month 5-6: paper 1 completion
- leverage engineering background
- focus on dynamics and statics gaps

month 7-8: paper 2 completion
- complex analysis, linear programming
- numerical analysis revision

month 9-12: answer writing and pyqs
- proof presentation practice
- time management in exam
- mock tests

WHO SHOULD STILL CONSIDER:

if you:
- genuinely enjoy mathematical reasoning
- have patience for proof-based learning
- can invest 10-12 months for optional alone
- scored well in engineering maths consistently
- have access to good maths coaching/mentor

then maths optional can work. high risk, high reward.

WHO SHOULD AVOID:

if you:
- just want easy optional based on background
- hate theoretical proofs
- have limited preparation time
- struggle with abstract thinking
- dont have guidance access

then choose sociology/geography/pub ad. seriously. no shame in strategic choice.

FINAL THOUGHT:

engineering degree is not maths optional qualification. its different beast entirely. approach with humility and realistic timeline. or choose something else.

engineering background to upsc maths optional - the reality gap and how to bridge it if you still want to try engineer here. thought maths optional would be cakewalk. was humbled badly. sharing reality for fellow engineers considering maths.

the initial assumption:

- did engineering maths for 4 years
- jee advanced maths was tough, upsc cant be harder
- numerical ability is strength
- less theory, more problems = comfort zone

all these assumptions were wrong.

reality check:

upsc maths syllabus overlap with engineering: maybe 30%

what engineering covers:
- calculus (differential, integral)
- linear algebra basics
- differential equations
- numerical methods
- probability and statistics

what upsc adds:
- real analysis (rigorous proofs)
- complex analysis depth
- abstract algebra (groups, rings, fields)
- linear programming (optimization)
- mechanics (statics and dynamics)
- partial differential equations depth

the abstract algebra and real analysis portions have zero overlap with engineering curriculum. starting from scratch.

the difficulty difference:

jee maths: problem solving speed and accuracy
engineering maths: application-oriented, formula-based
upsc maths: proof-based, conceptual depth, answer writing

the biggest shock: upsc maths requires writing proofs. engineers rarely write proofs after 12th. we use formulas, get numerical answers. upsc wants mathematical reasoning written out.

syllabus analysis:

paper 1:
- linear algebra (doable for engineers)
- calculus (mostly familiar)
- analytic geometry (needs practice)
- ordinary differential equations (familiar)
- dynamics and statics (needs fresh learning)
- vector analysis (familiar)

paper 2:
- algebra (abstract - completely new)
- real analysis (new and challenging)
- complex analysis (partially familiar)
- linear programming (new but logical)
- partial differential equations (needs depth)
- numerical analysis (familiar)
- mechanics (new for most engineers)

engineers who succeed:

pattern observed from successful engineer-maths-optional combinations:

1. they started fresh. didnt assume engineering knowledge transfers.

2. they invested heavily in abstract algebra and real analysis. spent 3-4 months just on these.

3. they practiced proof writing daily. treated it as new skill acquisition.

4. they found specialized guidance. maths optional coaching or mentor who understood their gaps.

5. they gave 2 attempts minimum. first attempt was learning curve, second was scoring.

my strategy now:

month 1-2: abstract algebra from zero
- gallian book cover to cover
- prove every theorem, dont just read

month 3-4: real analysis foundation
- bartle and sherbert
- epsilon-delta proofs practice

month 5-6: paper 1 completion
- leverage engineering background
- focus on dynamics and statics gaps

month 7-8: paper 2 completion
- complex analysis, linear programming
- numerical analysis revision

month 9-12: answer writing and pyqs
- proof presentation practice
- time management in exam
- mock tests

who should still consider:

if you:
- genuinely enjoy mathematical reasoning
- have patience for proof-based learning
- can invest 10-12 months for optional alone
- scored well in engineering maths consistently
- have access to good maths coaching/mentor

then maths optional can work. high risk, high reward.

who should avoid:

if you:
- just want easy optional based on background
- hate theoretical proofs
- have limited preparation time
- struggle with abstract thinking
- dont have guidance access

then choose sociology/geography/pub ad. seriously. no shame in strategic choice.

final thought:

engineering degree is not maths optional qualification. its different beast entirely. approach with humility and realistic timeline. or choose something else.  nikhil mathur topic-discussion upsc

Engineering background to UPSC Maths optional - the reality gap and how to bridge it if you still want to try

maths optional has this reputation of being high scoring for people with maths background. i am engineer with decent maths skills. chose maths optional. here is the reality nobody talks about.nnTHE MYTH:nnmaths optional is objective. right answer gets full marks. no subjectivity. with engineering background, you already know 50% of syllabus. easy 300+ score.nnTHE REALITY:nn1. UPSC MATHS IS DIFFERENTnnengineering maths and upsc maths are completely different animals. in engineering, we learned application. upsc wants proofs and theorems. i knew how to use laplace transforms but had never proved them. first few months were humbling.nn2. SYLLABUS IS MASSIVEnnpeople say maths syllabus is small. its actually dense. each topic goes deep. linear algebra alone has enough content for weeks. real analysis is a beast. topology section traumatizes people.nncompare this to pub ad or sociology where you can read limited books and be done. maths needs problem solving on every topic. no shortcuts.nn3. UNPREDICTABLE PAPERSnnrecent years, upsc has been giving unconventional questions. standard problems from coaching material are not enough. they twist questions in ways that require deep understanding, not pattern matching.nn2024 paper had questions that were not in any standard material. people who relied only on coaching struggled.nn4. NO PARTIAL MARKING BENEFITnnin humanities optionals, you write something relevant, you get some marks. in maths, wrong answer is zero. you either solve it or you dont. the binary nature is stressful.nni have seen people get 180 in maths despite spending 2 years on it. because few questions went wrong in exam hall and marks collapsed.nn5. CALCULATION ERRORS COST HEAVILYnnyou can understand everything conceptually but make arithmetic error in step 3 of 10 step problem. entire answer becomes wrong. i spent hours on accuracy drills just to reduce silly mistakes.nn6. TIME PRESSURE IS REALnnpeople assume maths is faster because no essay writing. wrong. complex calculations take time. some problems need 25-30 minutes each. if you get stuck, time vanishes.nnWHAT ACTUALLY HELPS:nn1. START FROM BASICSnndont assume engineering knowledge is enough. start from BSc level books. build foundations properly. this takes 2-3 months just for groundwork.nn2. THEOREM PROOFS ARE ESSENTIALnnmemorize proofs. especially for real analysis and linear algebra. upsc asks direct proof questions. you cant derive on the spot.nn3. PREVIOUS YEARS ARE GOLDnnsolve last 20 years papers. not just solve - understand the pattern. some topics appear every year. some never appear. focus accordingly.nn4. SPEED BUILDINGnnpractice timed problem solving. start with 20 minutes per problem, reduce to 12-15 minutes. speed comes only from practice.nn5. BACKUP PLAN FOR TOUGH QUESTIONSnnin exam, some questions will be unsolvable. have strategy:n- attempt what you know firstn- come back to tough onesn- partial attempts for partial marks where possiblenn6. MENTAL PREPARATIONnnmaths paper can destroy confidence. one bad question early on affects rest of paper. prepare mentally to stay calm regardless of what appears.nnMY HONEST ASSESSMENT:nnis maths optional worth it? depends:nnCHOOSE MATHS IF:n- you genuinely enjoy problem solvingn- you can handle pressure of right/wrong answersn- you have 12+ months for optional alonen- you are okay with high variance in scoresnnAVOID MATHS IF:n- you just want objective paper for easy marksn- you are uncomfortable with uncertaintyn- you have less than 10 months for optionaln- you panic when stuck on problemsnncurrent status: i am continuing with maths because i genuinely enjoy it. but i went in with wrong expectations. hoping this helps others make informed choice.nnscoring in maths is possible but its earned through genuine mastery, not just background advantage.

maths optional ground reality from an engineer - why its not as easy as people claim and what actually happens maths optional has this reputation of being high scoring for people with maths background. i am engineer with decent maths skills. chose maths optional. here is the reality nobody talks about.nnthe myth:nnmaths optional is objective. right answer gets full marks. no subjectivity. with engineering background, you already know 50% of syllabus. easy 300+ score.nnthe reality:nn1. upsc maths is differentnnengineering maths and upsc maths are completely different animals. in engineering, we learned application. upsc wants proofs and theorems. i knew how to use laplace transforms but had never proved them. first few months were humbling.nn2. syllabus is massivennpeople say maths syllabus is small. its actually dense. each topic goes deep. linear algebra alone has enough content for weeks. real analysis is a beast. topology section traumatizes people.nncompare this to pub ad or sociology where you can read limited books and be done. maths needs problem solving on every topic. no shortcuts.nn3. unpredictable papersnnrecent years, upsc has been giving unconventional questions. standard problems from coaching material are not enough. they twist questions in ways that require deep understanding, not pattern matching.nn2024 paper had questions that were not in any standard material. people who relied only on coaching struggled.nn4. no partial marking benefitnnin humanities optionals, you write something relevant, you get some marks. in maths, wrong answer is zero. you either solve it or you dont. the binary nature is stressful.nni have seen people get 180 in maths despite spending 2 years on it. because few questions went wrong in exam hall and marks collapsed.nn5. calculation errors cost heavilynnyou can understand everything conceptually but make arithmetic error in step 3 of 10 step problem. entire answer becomes wrong. i spent hours on accuracy drills just to reduce silly mistakes.nn6. time pressure is realnnpeople assume maths is faster because no essay writing. wrong. complex calculations take time. some problems need 25-30 minutes each. if you get stuck, time vanishes.nnwhat actually helps:nn1. start from basicsnndont assume engineering knowledge is enough. start from bsc level books. build foundations properly. this takes 2-3 months just for groundwork.nn2. theorem proofs are essentialnnmemorize proofs. especially for real analysis and linear algebra. upsc asks direct proof questions. you cant derive on the spot.nn3. previous years are goldnnsolve last 20 years papers. not just solve - understand the pattern. some topics appear every year. some never appear. focus accordingly.nn4. speed buildingnnpractice timed problem solving. start with 20 minutes per problem, reduce to 12-15 minutes. speed comes only from practice.nn5. backup plan for tough questionsnnin exam, some questions will be unsolvable. have strategy:n- attempt what you know firstn- come back to tough onesn- partial attempts for partial marks where possiblenn6. mental preparationnnmaths paper can destroy confidence. one bad question early on affects rest of paper. prepare mentally to stay calm regardless of what appears.nnmy honest assessment:nnis maths optional worth it? depends:nnchoose maths if:n- you genuinely enjoy problem solvingn- you can handle pressure of right/wrong answersn- you have 12+ months for optional alonen- you are okay with high variance in scoresnnavoid maths if:n- you just want objective paper for easy marksn- you are uncomfortable with uncertaintyn- you have less than 10 months for optionaln- you panic when stuck on problemsnncurrent status: i am continuing with maths because i genuinely enjoy it. but i went in with wrong expectations. hoping this helps others make informed choice.nnscoring in maths is possible but its earned through genuine mastery, not just background advantage.  nikhil mathur topic-discussion upsc

Nikhil Mathur

Posts